Summation of the FCC “Town Meeting” 3/8/04

 

 

The Panel of experts consisted of:

 

Led by Federal Communications Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein

 

Representing newspapers: Mary Anna Towler, co-publisher of City Newspaper and past president of the New York Press Association.

 

Representing Radio: Richard C. Greene, owner and manager of WLVL-AM, which serves Lockport and Niagara County, and is one of only three locally owned radio stations in the Buffalo area.

 

Representing communications employees: Damone Richardson, Director of Survey Research and Strategy Development with the Cornell University School of Industrial and labor Relations, Extension division in New York City.

 

Representing television: Norm Silverstein, president and CEO of WXXI Public Broadcasting Council in Rochester.

 

Dr. Lauren Vicker, Chair of the Communications department of St. John Fisher College, will serve as our moderator for the evening.

 

Louise M. Slaughter, Member of Congress, put on the event. For developments as they occur, both in here and in Washington: www.louise.house.gov

 

Topic of discussion: The effects or growing media consolidation and how that impacts our news, our lives, and our democracy.

 

Summation of the town hall meeting on media issues:

 

  • Louise started the show with a very well informed speech. She pointed out that she and Mr. Adelstein have been fighting for some time to drum up support for localism and at one point there was a vote to try and put the genie back in the box on June 6th of this past year. That the government is so influenced by the media giants that no one even bothered to let FCC bring issue to the people and took the issue to one small city for feedback. It’s only been recently that at least 2million emails stating concern are now being sent to the FCC and Louise, which in her opinion is very significant. No matter what political affiliation all can see eye to eye on this issue.

 

  • Louise and Mr. Adelstien pointed out that less then one minute of total airtime is now spent on local news and issues on TV and radio. Most towns and cities in the US now have one newspaper that is owned by out of town companies whom are not informed on local issues.

 

  • 3 companies now own most of the media Viacom, Clear Channel and Westwood One. That the media has lost its responsibility to big business that can buy the government and persuade media with money to no longer report on important local issues that affect a citizen’s everyday life and keep the government honest.

 

  • Media companies are having a race to the bottom, all in the name of money. Brought to a head by the Super Bowl incident.

 

  • Anti-trust laws will not apply under the telecommunications act of 1996 and now cross ownership of radio and TV are now possible. Outsourcing of jobs is now prevalent and even some news stories are now done out of town and broadcast locally, for example the weather. An audience member whom was affected by this outsourcing also pointed out this fact.

 

  • It was said that the super bowl incident responsibility infighting between Viacom and MTV was a joke because Viacom owns MTV.

 

  • They said that non-localism can lead to dangerous situations such as in one city there was a chemical spill that was creeping towards peoples homes and when the local authorities went to inform people through the local media no one was around to answer phones because all were automated by companies out of town except for one.

 

  • They and the panel in general kept pointing out that no democracy is left in the media, which was in my opinion mentioned way to much and kind of cheapened the idea.

 

  • Adelstein said that media is still a business but the spectrum is limited, and truly owned by the public thus the FCC needs to inform and police them that the government can’t just issue anyone a license since new frequencies can’t be created, the government can‘t play mother nature and expand the spectrum.

 

  • Louise mentioned Bob but casually by saying "We all know what happened here in Rochester". It was very classy.

 

 

  • They also mentioned how big companies such as Clear Channel fire the local host and bring in a new "local" out of town host to their liking (puppet).

 

  • Adelstein also said it may be a hard issue to solve because the government likes to use  "grand fathering in" when it comes to repealing anything. Meaning if they repeal everything today it only stops different new companies from becoming media giants all the others remain status quo such as Clear Channel. This is why some companies move quickly when the government makes a decision that doesn’t immediately have high returns.

 

  • Mary Anne Towler’s main point was most towns and cities in US now have one newspaper that is owned by out of town companies. That the D and C was seen as fluff and a feel good joke, which received, a resounding applause from the audience. I hate her paper but she seemed very conservative in her speech.

 

  • 3 companies now own most major media Richard C. Greene pointed out. That to own a radio station now it would take at least six million in capital hardly any room for the little local guy to start up a locally owned station. That Buffalo has only three independent stations left.

 

  • Damone Richardson I must admit was a bore and his opening sentence contained a double negative, which lost me. His main point was the outsourcing of media both home and abroad and how media giants affect the little guy worker.

 

  • Norm Silverstein was good but wore his liberalism on his sleeve in my opinion. He pointed out that 3 companies now own most of media; Rochester has only WXXI public TV and radio left, and no independents. He mentioned the movie "network" from the mid seventies with the now famous phrase "were as mad as hell and were not going to take it anymore" that at the time the movie seemed far fetched but says it now sums up today’s modern media. He mentioned Bob and slammed him but also equally slammed Clear Channel saying that they could not make the decision to fire Bob and let an out of Towner from Texas whom was not locally informed make the decision.

 

 

All in all I thought it was worthwhile, but I do smell a rat only because they seemed to dwell on the decency issue. I fear they will use this to stamp out hosts that don’t agree with them such as Bob. I feel the solution lies in turning back the clock, repealing the 1996 telecommunications act and bust up the rest under monopoly laws to get around this "grand fathering in".

 

The only part that was a joke was the question and answer session. I thought people having to get up and announce himself or she was ridiculous. There was one real kook who was saying the media has not and will not show tapes of the plane hitting the pentagon on 911. The last straw came when the self-centered blah blah blah from “people for a better bus terminal” had to announce herself and her organization, that’s when I got the hell out of there.

 

Note: If I have made any mistakes I apologize in advance I am going from memory and some very brief notes, I was in the standing room only section, which made it hard to take notes. This is also a summation not intended to be complete sentences or well written.

 

 

 

Solutions: (as suggested by representative Slaughter)

 

Tell policymakers what you think.

In 2003, over 2 million people contacted the FCC and Congress and it made a difference.

 

The FCC accepts public comments through their electronic comment filing system:

 

http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/ or you can reach them by phone at 1-888-CALL-FCC

 

Speak out for media reform.

Talk to your friends, family, and colleagues about media reform. Organize a group in your area to discuss media issues and plan actions. Make media an issue within groups you are already active in.

 

Use the media to raise awareness.

Write an Op-ed or letter to the editor of your local newspaper, telling them what you think is wrong with media and what should be done (go to congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media). Call in to talk radio shows to voice your perspective. Engage alternative media like your local public access TV station, church or community newsletters.

 

Become an e-activist.

Free Press sends updates to activists about campaigns to support or oppose legislation. You can subscribe at http://www.mediareform.net/mailinglist.php

 

Ask candidates about media reform.

Tell candidates for elected office why you are concerned about media and ask them if they will support public interest media policies.

 

Check your local stations’ public files.

Radio and television stations are required to maintain a public file, containing information about ownership, citizen agreements, children’s programming, and political advertising. All you have to do is walk into the station’s headquarters during business and request to see the Public File. This shows the station that citizens are interested in holding it accountable and provides you with information about how they are complying with public interest obligations.

 

Participate in the broadcast license renewal process.

In New York, radio station licenses are up for renewal in June 2006, TV licenses in June 2007. If you feel your local broadcasters are not serving the public interest, you can file comments with the FCC (www.fcc.gov/e-file/) to be considered when the FCC reviews the stations’ applications.

 

Get involved with a media reform organization near you.

There are many organizations across the country doing great work on media literacy and media policy. Find one near you using this online database: http://www.mediare.net/organizations.php

 

Learn more.

The web site http://www.mediareform.net provides a wealth of information. Also try books by Robert McChesney, Ben Bagdikian, or Eric Alterman.

 

 

 

Contact the author

Steve@RochesterWatch.com